Clifton Carl Lamar v. State
This text of Clifton Carl Lamar v. State (Clifton Carl Lamar v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 9, 2016
NO. 03-14-00729-CR
Clifton Carl Lamar, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 264TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s
judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction.
Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment as follows: to delete “See attached–
Disclosure of Plea Recommendations Attached Hereto and Made a Part Hereof” under the
“Terms of Plea Bargain” heading. The judgment, as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is
indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Clifton Carl Lamar v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifton-carl-lamar-v-state-texapp-2016.