Clifford v. Waldrop

23 Ill. 336
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1860·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Caton, C. J.

The petition in this case was insufficient. The statute requires that the petition for the writ “ shall set forth and show ” that the judgment before the justice of the peace was not the result of negligence. This petition only sets forth that fact, but it does not show it. The petition should set forth the facts which show that the party was not guilty of negligence in not attending to and defending the cause before the justice. The mere statement of the conclusion that the judgment was not the result of his negligence, does not show that fact. That is a conclusion for the court to draw from the facts stated. Russel v. Pickering, 17 Ill. R. 31.

The judgment of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and .the appeal dismissed, and the judgment of the justice stand in force.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clifford v. Waldrop, 23 Ill. 336 (Ill. 1860).

23 Ill. 336 (Clifford v. Waldrop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayton Scales Co. v. Phelps
259 Ill. App. 43 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)
Simpson v. Sligar
239 Ill. App. 484 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)
Couch v. Illinois Central Railroad
213 Ill. App. 429 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1919)
St. Louis, B. & S. Ry. Co. v. Gundlach
69 Ill. App. 192 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Horrell v. Horrell
52 Ill. App. 477 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1894)
Tilton v. Larimer County Agricultural & Mechanical Ass'n
6 Colo. 288 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1882)