Clifford v. State
This text of 2009 ND 64 (Clifford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/30/09 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2009 ND 67
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Lam Bao Tran, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20080240
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gary E. Euren, Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-
2806, for plaintiff and appellee. Submitted on brief.
Brian W. Nelson, 111 South 9th Street, Fargo, ND 58103-1831, for defendant and appellant. Submitted on brief.
State v. Tran
[¶1] Lam Bao Tran appealed from a criminal judgment entered subsequent to a conditional guilty plea to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of ecstasy. On appeal, Tran argued the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence because there was not sufficient evidence to support a finding of probable cause for a search warrant. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2009 ND 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifford-v-state-nd-2009.