Clifford v. Cabiness

31 Ky. 384, 1 Dana 384, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 98
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 16, 1833
StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ky. 384 (Clifford v. Cabiness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clifford v. Cabiness, 31 Ky. 384, 1 Dana 384, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 98 (Ky. Ct. App. 1833).

Opinion

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

On motion, Cabiness recovered a judgment against Clifford, as constable, and against Dennis and Hay, bis sureties, for a failure to return, within twenty days after the return day, a fieri facias which had been issued in favor of Cabiness against Bell, by Isaac Bard, a justice of the peace, upon a judgment rendered by John Campbell, another magistrate; and which execution was made returnable to the office of Bard.

It appears that, after the execution had been delivered to the constable, and before the return day, the county court made an order, reciting that.Bard had ceased to be a justice of the, peace, and directing the clerk to deliver his official books and papers to Campbell; and it appears also, that the execution in favor of Cabiness against Bell, was not returned to Campbell’s office until about six months after the return day.

On this state of case, the circuit court pronounced judgment against the constable and his sureties, for the amount of the execution and legal interest, and ten per cent, damages. And this writ of error is brought to reverse that judgment.

As the judgment against Bell was rendered by Campbell, (who seems to have continued in office, and to have retained his records until after the execution was issued,) Bard had "no authority to issue the execution upon it ; and consequently, the constable was not bound to execute, or return, it to Bard or to Campbell. And moreover, had the constable been.liable for not returning the [385]*385execution, he was liable, on motion, for only the amount clue at the time of his default, and ten per cent, damages on that amount. He was not responsible for interest also. Trover vs. Sharp, 4 J. J. Mar. 79.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause-remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Ky. 384, 1 Dana 384, 1833 Ky. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifford-v-cabiness-kyctapp-1833.