Clifford E. Green v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Clifford E. Green v. United States

397 F.2d 643, 130 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7151

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 1968

Docket21519

StatusPublished

This text of 397 F.2d 643 (Clifford E. Green v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clifford E. Green v. United States, 397 F.2d 643, 130 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7151 (D.C. Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Green was convicted of robbery, 22 D.C.Code § 2901 (1967), and assault *644 with intent to commit robbery, 22 D.C. Code § 501 (1967). The principal questions raised on this appeal relate to alleged trial court error in permitting the prosecutor to impeach the defendant with cross-examination respecting a prior conviction of assault and in permitting the prosecutor to impeach a defense witness with cross-examination respecting her chastity. While these issues would require serious consideration 1 if properly raised in the trial court, in the circumstances of this case we will not notice them for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.

1

. See Brown v. United States, 125 U.S. App.D.C. 220, 223, 370 F.2d 242, 245 (1966); Sacks v. United States, 41 App. D.C. 34, 36 (1913).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Green was convicted of robbery, 22 D.C.Code § 2901 (1967), and assault *644 with intent to commit robbery, 22 D.C. Code § 501 (1967). The principal questions raised on this appeal relate to alleged trial court error in permitting the prosecutor to impeach the defendant with cross-examination respecting a prior conviction of assault and in permitting the prosecutor to impeach a defense witness with cross-examination respecting her chastity. While these issues would require serious consideration 1 if properly raised in the trial court, in the circumstances of this case we will not notice them for the first time on appeal.

Affirmed.

1

. See Brown v. United States, 125 U.S. App.D.C. 220, 223, 370 F.2d 242, 245 (1966); Sacks v. United States, 41 App. D.C. 34, 36 (1913).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 F.2d 643, 130 U.S. App. D.C. 82, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clifford-e-green-v-united-states-cadc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack