Clifford Broman & Son, Inc. v. Town of Babylon

222 A.D.2d 643, 635 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13947
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose on a public improvement mechanic’s lien, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated December 1, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment against the defendants Town of Babylon and Hi-Tech Mechanical, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff’s lien was valid only as to any amount still due and unpaid to the subcontractor, Yellowstone Equipment Inc. (see, Ace Contr. Co. v Garfield & Arma Assocs., 148 Misc 2d 475, 477). Since a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the subcontractor was owed any money at the time the plaintiff’s lien was filed, the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clifford Broman & Son, Inc. v. Town of Babylon, 222 A.D.2d 643, 635 N.Y.S.2d 698, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13947 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

222 A.D.2d 643 (Clifford Broman & Son, Inc. v. Town of Babylon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peri Formwork Systems, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
65 A.D.3d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Nastasi & Associates, Inc. v. TAG Court Square, LLC
61 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)