Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/Clifford Bart Dunbar v. Naima El Khaoua

Clifford Bart Dunbar v. Naima El Khaoua

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 15, 2015·No. 03-14-00345-CV·Published

Opinion

TBxts court of f\rfie/its; nz%o ozstrvct, at Ausrz/u

hio, 03-/7- oo^j Vvf- cv

September 15, 2015

Ch(torJ- far PuA>io/^. fipf^UK^T v.

PZTzUoiO Fbfc RQH£PiaZf06

TO THB, HotioKftGlB JoBg£S oi= Sflxo COufiT:

CQ/Y>£S ^OtJj Cl'Ucrd dart OuAtL.y jlppjU^ a*J respectfully fl*>V/« WuY tto<oomUc CtvrT to qrwT flpacllCAlTci Re/veorii^ (?/j Qa-osz. pj0, o2 -/v -&o3 VvT- c\/ rw r*»ij £>o/T

2W Su/^jorT T/v^eO-f fypalUvT ujitl re.speetf^(ty shu> JhcT Th& CourT skoultL c^scasT TA/j tie^ecrvnjg _

X

RnsT 3ws/o(\ o£ ^rror TheT OpptBiU^Tv*°J dtp/weJ of hj Rc<fir To * F&>r ftA^J £<ioiTMe, Process <rP ^ac^ Ay /Ae ft-**/ G^r

of 'cw U&j To de,»y flppcllcT} C6*>i-hlhl*ofi*l fctjkr To O^C Proc^SJ . (^RECEIVED f)f>pe.lfa*>1j )ssvt. u>cr 7Xcr r^t 7>/c/ Cov+T ckuScJ tTs\ SEPl5m d'**tr*1pc,*i 6y f^/;^ Tv ^iUoj fas p<^Tic?pti.no«s ,v ru (*Mi

This CaurT c&rrec?^ stcteJ rf<=r ;a>ai«%j- cc^oT £< C^M*J access To TU Courfr S^ply i>cc*<sSe. Tl±y art iv/HvfeS. Iaj ^ZXT.} 1X1 Xg^ /6i,/66 tfcx.Jl<*tfJ, 77ve £>^r •Rafter cUlksWcJ Tker*«s ;A>w^re X^ A>«>r W c/j alsJufe flfihT To pzrsovclly afpe&r- i*S Q~\J<Lry proceedi>Jq , ftppelU«r Jirf/uaT To appearj flppell^T Simply 7/veJ to proceed iy afftdawr a*>cl Cofres/>oA)oteA,ce, p> TU ^ud C&urT ot*d /fyy>e/tee, Jee flppe/ferij a*xeujtr To OKyi^l p^Ti>T)6^ a/uol flppclUtulj P^pose-d frop<uTy OjuiSjOA)

fa Ths Cenjr-rjATtJi ;*t L*<*°tJ V, GWeAU-c/k^ J^tf Xw„2U 7?;; 7? 7 (T*x.flPp^ ^T/AJ fru^pez) 'V^e rftUkteu/ a/fac/ Coo/\£r ciec/j;oA* oaj otw iu^Tu revues? n perDdpeTe. elThtr f>ersoi**lly or py 4,lfenJ<*Tti]e. /ne<SA£, -fi^ C/u aiaje o£ J;scr.7iC*lr J&l. at 7W - /J 7Wc/ Uf a****, /& cfofcrel** <W ci cpQSo)Tf e-T&cTA/e/^ oa/tf TAe. //uA^fe &o»v p<x^Tt£lf>*T*rty , Xo(. ''

/)/>^e//ee .Coa>TuxL<1 fUr Appellor OHU\reA hs /vyir To appear arod (Jefwd AiYhje/^ Iccatxse. ctllUoovk kc receded /^ollc^ 0f r/ve T/v*/, /pe /We /uo pe^uesT To

p^-ior To Ttla I,

/Weflc/jEr <noStMtr- To Tke. ordc,^ pe.Tf7J<s/\J <a.A*ol flppe\\evTj bropoS&d pwpz/Ty d^^ic^i,

profxif T/u i^ATTt^Q T<> TAe 7Wel 6>^T c^J- %>eAeC Oe.ioi-z. lie olcfc c£ f^e Trie!, TVv5 Cot^T" CtfeAj acknowledged Appejhojts i7ere^e<^T Iaj ktf Ga*swv* TV rA-e ori*;n*t petiT/0fj I a**i cvrreuTly irtCarceroid ky Mc TeJccj PdpatfhevT of Oi/n;^/ vJVftce- TW T-f ft^ aA>y ^eo5<»AJ T^e Coo/T requires (*y pr*Sc*ice ?ke CoorT u>*/l N>teJL Tv> &eA/dv u>arA*A>7 /vve ^«cfc J\>

TAiX Coc/rr T^trJ CojocludeJf ... t-br Tk.$ S'lhTcfrZAiT tS \to$oThtc)e.fiiT Tfr comsT>TvTc. c t^ec^yesT flr-o. ic^ck Ute/WA>7 o<* <? re^yejT .7^ p<±*T?cip<;Tz. £y alTupwTfv^ fVveCM-f O/v^ T^C r&CorJ does Met ^kocAj rtcr 0vAJbcS~ OtkeruJise a/TTe/yfa.ol To p^fpcip^T^ ^T 7rjrC( ;*/ a/M, //

ft ppe.\\ct*rt if AA>T #,o £7To/*>«y, TXe. Courts ka^<.

r^pecTtd\y ke>td TkcT Uy oe/\Te,u/ o-cTt^ty G*> Tkt.\r oco/J

clTTomj^ys fkoi+ld v*T ie. j\elJ To 7Ae Xft/^e sTricT

npperllevT Specifically d^o-u/eol ^e WeJ T/^y.fJj To.

patTpapoTe iV 7Ae 77»Jc/ "f u*L>Te.<Jts /na^e^ TAe Courts &»c) fke SfcTiL of Texas uo#^fd <vIUuj h>m To Jc xa.

Appellee. -C* Ud htr- &rtj<Aicl WoTiOAi &r* Oiifarc*- .

nppe\lc*tT GKKSureseJ To 7Ae Caor Va*>J- flpptlhc- /l/pe/irvT Speci&cclly sTcTe-d if Tke. 7>/o/ Court r<L<fyired. Ks prest«x.t. jAe 7/Scl Cc><j>rT w^oW Acue /o ker>ck {jiarfa-ot rOppell<*>T To 7»e /AT<i/ Co<JrT OCccuSe. rrppellcvf u;cj preofT*? fro/r\ aTTeA*L/^ Ay He- -WTe o^ feic^J .

Appellee j-f'/e^ her Proposed frt>p*tfy Ototsio.-J* nppe.UcfT pf>o/*pth Gi+s^tred Ta Tke. "fc/c/ CoorT ewd We Appellee. isJ-iTk kit Ouj/o Proposed Property AvjJ/oaJ„ nppe.lUc r^lea cm fj/ne^ded- PeTiftoss Tuj0 c/«y_r 4t&>^ Fk<. T/Sc I a^cJ- Appellant UtaJ tr/Oc^/e To a^we/^ 7A-e. fi/*e+*<lej PeTitx^ ie&A€- &r durWj f/sql due- To hs rece\\ji<*<} il~ 7he. day before. TogI. nppencvT KsSas pr-e*/e*jTed -tv»oav pa*TiciPrt>'vy PersoHvlly by Tke. STeTt. of Texts ct^d )Ts ao^^ey <Ae

JCm pppeWcfJTj Re.oye.jT Tor- de. foo\m he&ri/oal k\s Grov*>dj •£>r Ht Ke.cAi^ U*-Ae Aec«,cue fAe 7/Vc/ C&*saT (i) a?d M»7" G(/ouJ /vim fa parliC^poTc c>a>J /o/Jored A<"j aT/e^fr To terttclpJe,j U) o. Hotted qa; i~/nprt>px,/* a^e^me**?" fo Tke. PeTiTioti ty flppelhzz KMiThooT Cji\)n*) f\ppe UatST aio cpporToMtTy %re-tcTe rtf (3 j mode, o>*> i/* proper property cAiat/oa// aW 60 Ufi/d ft-f>(>ellc»T ot fault far ^f ie,^ pr^Se^T u,tt*i TKc STkTt. of Tex&f <u*£ its ao^ncys oreoe.MT&d A,/w (s*>/n.

Tm f\ppel\oJls deoyesj fc>r- AJ*<^ Tna-lj ftppe.lU/vT raised T^e. x«"^t ctro^/jds <-V»TA oddaTtoM<l OO^Q. laKjJ /a* Svpp&rT

0/j direct ftppe&l flppe.lb*jT cgatto po^cd Tke So/»e fevr (h) cj routes, Tkt$ CoorT Tke/o r-u(ec\J 'V<? preserve o- Co/oplairfT -far 6ir ^cviCuJj a party f*vST ka.ve fre.scrf*d To 7*«- Trm I C?vrT a. Ti*e,ly reouesT^ okjecTnfiJ, &r moT**^ T^T sT*T*s ike Sped£,t yrevAtdj for TU Jested rullvj, ;f TUy ore W0-T oppere^T frof* T^e C**>UxT *$ Tke, r^ouesT^ oijecpofj or ShoT/cri „Tex. K< fyp. K33, l(*)(dfa)."

To j*T TA;j Op-.^jejj s?«Atd it To re<ysirt> 7*Ac impossible of a*J i<0/n«Te,< TklS CourT i5 Soy)***} P)ppe\\**>T <dzd foot QreSerW, T^e Conpla^l tiouo «ije urcj fippe)t°*"T Supposed to UaUe T& preserve TU co/npl*i*T? flfpell^T olid AJoT kjvo^ o^Til Ae rec&uzd JU uf;&*l O^ree. 0f D^te'' Tkr Tke. Trial C<n>rT vJ*J q**vj Tt ,01*0re all n>s Co<s»T-f pr*pt>s<ilsj TUTTU Trld CourT uw jo'tMj TV PH*"' Affelk* To oMc*d Tkt. bzTiTiOfi) 0.r<d /vve£e ^Z^i nlUf*Tfo*>3 Jk*T flppill^T ked A>*T Ud 7//*e To aiose^e^ <**d drUer^r^ fi*>d ftpp^H^T *T •ficulr -faA /oof I**"] preSe^T aW cz^ard a-li 7U co^tno^iTy property To ftppelUt'

U «I/aui This 7S T* rwofe* frocfrery of Tke. .UA>iTU ST*Tcj CopsTiToT/caj/ fcrsT A*e^t) /*tA>T r,oAT TZ r&McSJ /*s JKi. CouhT of L*vJ) <W TU U^iTed SnTej CoHsD7»Tto.^ foo/TeeMflv R/*tA>d/ne#Ts fttyir To Ove Process <*-W Eoya I

Pr&TecIic+J of W>e, JLa^J..

f)s fh;£ CootTSfoTtd i*i Co^pUll V<ST*Te.y $<T&u>Jd /7&, IfS"

(Tey^ocxX) ( DQv okje<Jfo,\i iS SoffaciwT To preserve wr»r f>r appeal )f)T flouts Toe Trie! judye To r*cke a/s /V'fcMea rvli^j oa^ P1*- oTker parly To* tenedy fAe de,{\<J,<< J- nCCord/h><j ly , &rre>r IS fiioT prejerved o* Jhs issue o*>d Tke. C«J>/op/c«VT i5 Uja'tVed, fippelU**T CoAtTe^ds he JtJ le.TTke Trtjjudyd f»cke <*fl itjlor/^ed ru/i'w Thraock his /fao//*>*J fir- o/e Abuw r\eari*Jy G/»d ItiS MoTtor^i for facuu Trial, The Triil CourT *"£ r^«_ ^Kv/juo^e ChoSe To i<jioor& Said f^oTto^s o>mo> hT Tkt^\ oe ovcrr^le-d Ly op^raVcrJ c+- /au> Thv$/ hppello^T preserved fUs /SS^e 7fte a*ly poSSiUt.

L>J&y he. Cotsld Si~A>ce Ibe -j/VTc o+TexcJ prexJevT&d h*rn (ros* pe.frSoM«l\y oijecTit^j To We Trid Co^ris e.*>d /9ppe/l*eJ o-cftoMS iro Ca^rT oT T^e. Jjpie. or Trio.!* JT

Tke CourT o£ fippeds r&GJoAiivy J*i <de^y>t^ fyp*fiw*£r Szco/^d ctrowd of -error} A/i IAJL CofusTiTt>TicA*vl Pi^^TTo fooTpce* i Puz. Process cfd €^ud ProTceTioA* of The Lq^/s U oJ fcns\T caacI shodJ te re-covsidesed'

f\ppedlcu^T orcjo-ed TkoT JAe felo/oy - c.oti\/ic-7io^ Groopd f-of diVorce. UJod f\/*tAj0e& To Tke, oricifjcl pe-Tthojo -fo-r* dtVJorce. i>»J v/to/vTro/J &f T*Xcj R^le. c<£ Civl) ProCecdo-re- 3l-0L\a.f ILoT C^oyires T^cT ffattoxe c**d PUed^s Sv^iecT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clifford Bart Dunbar v. Naima El Khaoua, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Clifford Bart Dunbar v. Naima El Khaoua (Clifford Bart Dunbar v. Naima El Khaoua) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.