Clifford A. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson

362 F.2d 1011, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5394
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 21, 1966·No. 15163_1·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court denied the application of appellant for a writ of habeas *1012 corpus. Appellant had been convicted of burglary in the state court on March 30, 1961. The single issue of substance raised on this appeal was the asserted retroactiveness of the Escobedo rule. The United States Supreme Court in Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 86 S.Ct. 1772, 16 L.Ed.2d 882 (June 20, 1966) ruled “that Escobedo affects only those cases in which the trial began after June 22, 1964, the date of that decision.” (86 S.Ct. p. 1775).

Appellant also contends that Jackson V. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) governs here. The undisputed facts make it very clear that there was no issue in this trial with respect to the voluntariness of the confession. The point has no merit.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clifford A. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson, 362 F.2d 1011, 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 5394 (3d Cir. 1966).

362 F.2d 1011 (Clifford A. Williams v. Raymond W. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marion v. Beto
302 F. Supp. 913 (N.D. Texas, 1969)
United States ex rel. Royster v. McMann
292 F. Supp. 116 (E.D. New York, 1968)
Leonard H. Lundberg v. Raymond J. Buchkoe, Warden
389 F.2d 154 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)
Jarrell v. Boles
272 F. Supp. 755 (N.D. West Virginia, 1967)
United States v. Marvin Feinberg
383 F.2d 60 (Second Circuit, 1967)