Cliett v. Cliett
This text of 173 S.E. 686 (Cliett v. Cliett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where the direct evidence touching the fact of an alleged marriage is conflicting, one of the parties affirming and the other denying that such marriage took place, and where all the material circumstances (save the fact that the party denying it contracted a subsequent marriage with a third person, which was regularly solemnized) go to support and corroborate the affirmative witness, a finding by the jury in favor of the affirmative of such issue is not contrary to evidence or to law. Jenkins v. Jenkins, 83 Ga. 283 (9 S. E. 541, 20 Am. St. R. 316).
2. There being ample evidence to support the verdict, it will not be disturbed by this court. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 S.E. 686, 178 Ga. 688, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cliett-v-cliett-ga-1934.