Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau

133 A.D.2d 481, 518 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49948
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 A.D.2d 383

Opinion

Motion for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted, without costs. No issue of fact was considered by this court. Pursuant to CPLR 5713, this court certifies that the following question of law, decisive of the correctness of its determination, has arisen, which in its opinion, ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals: "Did this court err as a matter of law, in modifying the order and judgment of the Supreme Court by reversing so much thereof as granted defendant Michael T. Dahowski’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him, denying said motion and, as so modified, affirming the order and judgment?” Weiss, J. P., Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau, 133 A.D.2d 481, 518 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49948 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

133 A.D.2d 481 (Clients' Security Fund v. Grandeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.