Click v. Southern Pacific Company

California Court of Appeal

Click v. Southern Pacific Company

298 P. 840, 113 Cal. App. 755, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1023

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 18, 1931

DocketDocket No. 371.

StatusPublished

This text of 298 P. 840 (Click v. Southern Pacific Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Click v. Southern Pacific Company, 298 P. 840, 113 Cal. App. 755, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1023 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

This action grew out of the same collision involved in the case of Click v. Southern Pac. Co., (No. 370) ante, p. 528 [298 Pac. 839] in which a motion of certain respondents has this day been granted. This action was brought by the minor son of deceased, through his guardian, to recover for personal injuries sustained by himself. The two actions were consolidated for trial, a similar verdict and judgment was returned and entered in each case, but separate appeals have been filed. The respondents Martin have moved to dismiss the appeal so far as they are concerned, upon the ground that the appellants are not aggrieved by the portion of the judgment in favor of these respondents, and that appellants have no right of appeal from that portion of the judgment which is in favor of these respondents.

*756 So far as this motion is concerned, the facts and circumstances in this case are identical with those in the case of Click v. Southern Pac. Co., above referred to, and for the reasons therein expressed and upon authority of that case, the motion to dismiss this appeal, in so far as respondents Martin are concerned, is granted.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

This action grew out of the same collision involved in the case of Click v. Southern Pac. Co., (No. 370) ante, p. 528 [298 Pac. 839] in which a motion of certain respondents has this day been granted. This action was brought by the minor son of deceased, through his guardian, to recover for personal injuries sustained by himself. The two actions were consolidated for trial, a similar verdict and judgment was returned and entered in each case, but separate appeals have been filed. The respondents Martin have moved to dismiss the appeal so far as they are concerned, upon the ground that the appellants are not aggrieved by the portion of the judgment in favor of these respondents, and that appellants have no right of appeal from that portion of the judgment which is in favor of these respondents.

*756 So far as this motion is concerned, the facts and circumstances in this case are identical with those in the case of Click v. Southern Pac. Co., above referred to, and for the reasons therein expressed and upon authority of that case, the motion to dismiss this appeal, in so far as respondents Martin are concerned, is granted.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

298 P. 840, 113 Cal. App. 755, 1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 1023, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/click-v-southern-pacific-company-calctapp-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack