Click v. Dowd
This text of 135 So. 840 (Click v. Dowd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Defendants in error brought an action at law against plaintiff in error to recover on a promissory note. There was a plea of payment and at the conclusion of all the testimony an instructed verdict was entered for the plaintiff. Defendant took writ of error. The instructed verdict is the basis for the sole assignment of error here.
The rule is elementary that when the defendant in an action on a promissory note tenders a plea of payment the burden is on him to prove his plea by a preponderance of the evidence. International Harvester Co. vs. Smith, 51 Fla. 220, 40 So. 840, 3 R. C. L. 1285. The evidence in this cause has been examined and it fails utterly to meet the 'requirements of this rule.
The judgment below is accordingly affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 So. 840, 102 Fla. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/click-v-dowd-fla-1931.