Click v. Dowd

135 So. 840, 102 Fla. 336
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 4, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 135 So. 840 (Click v. Dowd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Click v. Dowd, 135 So. 840, 102 Fla. 336 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Terrell, J.

— Defendants in error brought an action at law against plaintiff in error to recover on a promissory note. There was a plea of payment and at the conclusion of all the testimony an instructed verdict was entered for the plaintiff. Defendant took writ of error. The instructed verdict is the basis for the sole assignment of error here.

The rule is elementary that when the defendant in an action on a promissory note tenders a plea of payment the burden is on him to prove his plea by a preponderance of the evidence. International Harvester Co. vs. Smith, 51 Fla. 220, 40 So. 840, 3 R. C. L. 1285. The evidence in this cause has been examined and it fails utterly to meet the 'requirements of this rule.

The judgment below is accordingly affirmed.

Affirmed.

*337 Whitfield, P.J., and Davis, J., concur. Buford, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paladin Shipping Co, Ltd. v. Star Capital Fund, LLC
491 F. App'x 42 (Eleventh Circuit, 2012)
Touchberry v. Nemec
264 So. 2d 466 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Klein v. Witte
142 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Knauer v. Levy
115 So. 2d 776 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 So. 840, 102 Fla. 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/click-v-dowd-fla-1931.