Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cliatt v. State

Cliatt v. State

802 So. 2d 396, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16369, 2001 WL 1435541
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 2001
DocketNo. 5D00-715
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 396 (Cliatt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cliatt v. State, 802 So. 2d 396, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16369, 2001 WL 1435541 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the State candidly concedes, the defendant’s upward departure sentence is erroneous. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and the matter is remanded for imposition of a sentence within the applicable guidelines range.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 396, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 16369, 2001 WL 1435541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cliatt-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.