Cleveland Yancy Jernigan, Jr. v. Lay Barge Delta Five and Aquatic Contractors and Engineers, Inc.

Fifth Circuit

Cleveland Yancy Jernigan, Jr. v. Lay Barge Delta Five and Aquatic Contractors and Engineers, Inc.

423 F.2d 1327, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10541, 1970 A.M.C. 2169

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 26, 1970

Docket27789_1

StatusPublished

This text of 423 F.2d 1327 (Cleveland Yancy Jernigan, Jr. v. Lay Barge Delta Five and Aquatic Contractors and Engineers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Yancy Jernigan, Jr. v. Lay Barge Delta Five and Aquatic Contractors and Engineers, Inc., 423 F.2d 1327, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10541, 1970 A.M.C. 2169 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We adopt as the opinion of this court the well reasoned opinion of the district court. 1 Jernigan v. Lay Barge Delta Five, 296 F.Supp. 127 (S.D.Tex.1969). 2

Affirmed.

1

. Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

2

. Underwater Services, Inc. v. Brown & Root Marine Operators, Inc., 376 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1967), is incorrectly cited as appearing at 376 F.2d 832, in the opinion of the district court as reported.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI