Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.
577 A.2d 715, 216 Conn. 802, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 299
This text of 577 A.2d 715 (Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc., 577 A.2d 715, 216 Conn. 802, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 299 (Colo. 1990).
Opinion
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 610, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that because there was sufficient contact with Connecticut by the plaintiff truck driver and his employer, both being domiciled in New Jersey, to give this state jurisdiction, the Connecticut workers’ compensation law, both procedural and substantive, should apply?
“Should the Appellate Court have dismissed the appeal suo motu for lack of a final administrative determination?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.
588 A.2d 194 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1991)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
577 A.2d 715, 216 Conn. 802, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-us-printing-ink-inc-conn-1990.