Cleveland v. United States

522 U.S. 1074, 118 S. Ct. 850
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 20, 1998
DocketNo. 96-8837
StatusPublished

This text of 522 U.S. 1074 (Cleveland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. United States, 522 U.S. 1074, 118 S. Ct. 850 (1998).

Opinion

C. A. 1st Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1023.] Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered’ that Norman S. Zal-kind, Esq., of Boston, Mass., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner Enrique Gray-Santana in this ease. Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and it is ordered that John H. Cunha, Jr., Esq., of Boston, Mass., be appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner Donald E. Cleveland in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 U.S. 1074, 118 S. Ct. 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-united-states-scotus-1998.