Cleveland v. United States

451 F. App'x 283
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2011
DocketNo. 11-6990
StatusPublished

This text of 451 F. App'x 283 (Cleveland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. United States, 451 F. App'x 283 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Matthew Cleveland appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. United States, No. 9:11-cv-01335-TLW (D.S.C. July 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
451 F. App'x 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-united-states-ca4-2011.