Cleveland v. State

60 S.E. 801, 4 Ga. App. 62, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 202
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1908·No. 975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

In a prosecution for tlie offense of being intoxicated on a public highway, the burden is upon the State to show that the road in question was in fact a public highway. Johnson v. State, 1 Ga. App. 195 (58 S. E. 265). This may be shown directly or circumstantially. See Central Ry. Co. v. Ross, 107 Ga. 74 (32 S. E. 904). There is no evidence of any character in the record as to whether the road upon which the defendant was alleged to have been intoxicated was a public highway or not. . Judgment reversed.

Accusation of misdemeanor, from city court of Hartwell — Judge Hodges. December 16, 1907. Argued February 25, Decided March 16, 1908. A. G. & Julian McCurry, for plaintiff in error. James H. Shelton, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland v. State, 60 S.E. 801, 4 Ga. App. 62, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 202 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

60 S.E. 801 (Cleveland v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chapman v. State
68 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Southern Express Co. v. Hunnicutt & Turner
63 S.E. 26 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)