Cleveland v. Simpson
This text of 13 S.W. 851 (Cleveland v. Simpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action of trespass to try title brought by appellant. The defendant pleaded “ not guilty." The cause was tried by the court without a jury.
The conclusions of fact filed by the court show that the plaintiff deraigned his title to the premises as follows: W. D. Cleveland and C.
Lombardi,. composing the firm of W. D. Cleveland & Co., recovered in the District Court of Hill County a judgment for money against Dyer & Driggs and H. L. Dyer.
Execution upon the judgment was issued in the name of W. D. Cleveland alone, and levied upon the property in controversy, pursuant to which it was sold by the sheriff and deeded to plaintiff. The execution was not authorized by the judgment, and the sale and deed made under it can not be sustained. Rev. Stats., art. 2281; Battle v. Guedry, 58 Texas, 111; Criswell v. Ragsdale, 18 Texas, 443.
The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Delivered April 29, 1890.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 S.W. 851, 77 Tex. 96, 1890 Tex. LEXIS 1067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-simpson-tex-1890.