Cleveland v. Farley
9 Cow. 639
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided December 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
examined the question decided below; and was of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
Per totamrcuriam,
-Judgment affirmed.
See Galleger v. Brunel, 6 Cow. 350, 34ed., note.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cleveland v. Farley, 9 Cow. 639 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).
9 Cow. 639 (Cleveland v. Farley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hill Bros. v. Bank of Seneca
73 S.W. 307 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Meech v. Ensign
49 Conn. 191 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1881)
Sheldon v. Butler
24 Minn. 513 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1878)
Calkins v. Chandler
36 Mich. 320 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1877)
Johnson v. Knapp
36 Iowa 616 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1873)
Jacob v. New Jersey Car Spring Co.
36 N.J.L. 141 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1873)
Huntington v. Wellington
12 Mich. 10 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1863)
Robinson v. Gilman
43 N.H. 485 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1862)
Mallory v. . Gillett
21 N.Y. 412 (New York Court of Appeals, 1860)