Cleveland v. Eichengreen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Cleveland v. Eichengreen

205 Ill. App. 300, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1110

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedApril 16, 1917

DocketGen. No. 22,853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 Ill. App. 300 (Cleveland v. Eichengreen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland v. Eichengreen, 205 Ill. App. 300, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1110 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Garnishment—when garnishee is not entitled to retain money pending writ of error. A garnishee in an attachment action has no right after the attachment has been quashed, and an order discharging him as garnishee has been entered, to retain the money during the pendency of a writ of error where no supersedeas was allowed, and he was not a party to the writ of error, and no notice of its issuance had been served upon him, and the writ was never filed with the clerk of the court to which such writ issued. 3. Appeal and error, § 710*—what is effect of supersedeas. A supersedeas suspends the efficacy of a judgment, but does not, like reversal, annul the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Garnishment—when garnishee is not entitled to retain money pending writ of error. A garnishee in an attachment action has no right after the attachment has been quashed, and an order discharging him as garnishee has been entered, to retain the money during the pendency of a writ of error where no supersedeas was allowed, and he was not a party to the writ of error, and no notice of its issuance had been served upon him, and the writ was never filed with the clerk of the court to which such writ issued. 3. Appeal and error, § 710*—what is effect of supersedeas. A supersedeas suspends the efficacy of a judgment, but does not, like reversal, annul the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 Ill. App. 300, 1917 Ill. App. LEXIS 1110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-eichengreen-illappct-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack