Cleveland v. Cozart
This text of 83 S.W. 316 (Cleveland v. Cozart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After the death of the defendant was suggested, and a motion was made to revive the cause in the name of his administrator, the appearance of such administrator in filing an answer in which he alleged that he was the administrator, and that the cause had been revived in his name, was equivalent to a waiver of summons and a formal order of revivor. State Fair Asso. v. Townsend, 69 Ark. 219.
The court did not err in striking from the files the substituted answer, which was in conflict with the original, and set up no defense to the merits.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 S.W. 316, 72 Ark. 514, 1904 Ark. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-cozart-ark-1904.