Cleveland v. Commissioner

77 F.2d 184, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1370, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 4, 1935
DocketNo. 7464
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 77 F.2d 184 (Cleveland v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. Commissioner, 77 F.2d 184, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1370, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539 (5th Cir. 1935).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a stipulation entered into by the parties to the above numbered and entitled cause, this court having, ordered that its decision in cause numbered 7457 on the docket of this court (C. C. A.) 77 F.(2d) 180, wherein F. D. Flynn is petitioner, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is respondent, would be controlling in the first above numbered and entitled cause, and this court having denied the petition in said cause numbered 7457, it is ordered that the petition in the first above numbered and entitled cause be, and the same is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Espinosa v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 66 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
R. G. Cope, Jr., Inc. v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 476 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Dillman v. Commissioner
64 T.C. 797 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 F.2d 184, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1370, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-commissioner-ca5-1935.