Cleveland v. Commissioner

77 F.2d 184, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1370, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 4, 1935·No. No. 7464·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a stipulation entered into by the parties to the above numbered and entitled cause, this court having, ordered that its decision in cause numbered 7457 on the docket of this court (C. C. A.) 77 F.(2d) 180, wherein F. D. Flynn is petitioner, and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is respondent, would be controlling in the first above numbered and entitled cause, and this court having denied the petition in said cause numbered 7457, it is ordered that the petition in the first above numbered and entitled cause be, and the same is, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland v. Commissioner, 77 F.2d 184, 15 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 1370, 1935 U.S. App. LEXIS 4539 (5th Cir. 1935).

77 F.2d 184 (Cleveland v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Espinosa v. Commissioner
2000 T.C. Memo. 66 (U.S. Tax Court, 2000)
R. G. Cope, Jr., Inc. v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 476 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Dillman v. Commissioner
64 T.C. 797 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)