Cleveland v. Cleveland

159 S.E. 270, 172 Ga. 824, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 216
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 10, 1931
DocketNo. 8128
StatusPublished

This text of 159 S.E. 270 (Cleveland v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland v. Cleveland, 159 S.E. 270, 172 Ga. 824, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 216 (Ga. 1931).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. The only issue submitted to the jury was whether B. P. Cleveland, at the time of his death, was a resident of Polk County or of Ployd County. The evidence on this issue was conflicting, but was sufficient to authorize the jury to find that at tire time, of his death B. P. Cleveland was a resident of Ployd County. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial on the general grounds.

2. The excerpts from the charge of the court, in view of the general charge, show no error. Neither does the refusal to charge as requested show error.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. G. G. Bunn and Maddox, Matthews $ Owens, for plaintiffs in error. Porter & Mebane, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 S.E. 270, 172 Ga. 824, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-cleveland-ga-1931.