Cleveland v. Abraitis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Cleveland v. Abraitis

765 N.E.2d 985, 146 Ohio App. 3d 306

CourtOhio Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 10, 2001

DocketNo. 78110.

StatusPublished

This text of 765 N.E.2d 985 (Cleveland v. Abraitis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland v. Abraitis, 765 N.E.2d 985, 146 Ohio App. 3d 306 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Sarunas Abraitis appeals from a final judgment of conviction entered on April 12, 2000. Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on April 14, 2000, which the trial court denied on May 15, 2000. Subsequently, on May 31, 2000, appellant filed a notice of appeal.

A motion for reconsideration is not provided for in the Rules of Criminal Procedure and is therefore a nullity and does not suspend the time for filing a notice of appeal. Accord, e.g., In re Grand Jury (June 1, 1995), Washington App. No. 93CA09, 93CA10, 93CA12, unreported; State v. Marini (June 29, 1998), Tuscarawas App. Nos. 97 AP 020016 97 AP 120082, unreported; see, also, Pitts v. Dept. of Transportation (1981),67 Ohio St.2d 378, 379-381. Therefore, appellant has failed to file a timely notice of appeal pursuant to App.R. 4(A).

It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

JAMES D. SWEENEY, P.J., AND ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR. *Page 308

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Sarunas Abraitis appeals from a final judgment of conviction entered on April 12, 2000. Appellant filed a motion for reconsideration on April 14, 2000, which the trial court denied on May 15, 2000. Subsequently, on May 31, 2000, appellant filed a notice of appeal.

A motion for reconsideration is not provided for in the Rules of Criminal Procedure and is therefore a nullity and does not suspend the time for filing a notice of appeal. Accord, e.g., In re Grand Jury (June 1, 1995), Washington App. No. 93CA09, 93CA10, 93CA12, unreported; State v. Marini (June 29, 1998), Tuscarawas App. Nos. 97 AP 020016 97 AP 120082, unreported; see, also, Pitts v. Dept. of Transportation (1981),67 Ohio St.2d 378, 379-381. Therefore, appellant has failed to file a timely notice of appeal pursuant to App.R. 4(A).

It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

JAMES D. SWEENEY, P.J., AND ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR. *Page 308

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

765 N.E.2d 985, 146 Ohio App. 3d 306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-v-abraitis-ohioctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack