Cleveland v. Abraitis
Opinion
A motion for reconsideration is not provided for in the Rules of Criminal Procedure and is therefore a nullity and does not suspend the time for filing a notice of appeal. Accord, e.g., In re Grand Jury (June 1, 1995), Washington App. No. 93CA09, 93CA10, 93CA12, unreported; State v. Marini (June 29, 1998), Tuscarawas App. Nos. 97 AP 020016 97 AP 120082, unreported; see, also, Pitts v. Dept. of Transportation (1981),
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
JAMES D. SWEENEY, P.J., AND ANN DYKE, J., CONCUR. *Page 308
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
765 N.E.2d 985 (Cleveland v. Abraitis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.