Cleveland Trust Co. v. Oberlin (Vil.)

Lorain Circuit Court

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Oberlin (Vil.)

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 392, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 157

DecidedApril 26, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 392 (Cleveland Trust Co. v. Oberlin (Vil.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Lorain Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Trust Co. v. Oberlin (Vil.), 32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 392, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 157 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

HENRY, J.

Under Sec. 8324 and 8328 6. C. relating to mechanics’ liens and attested accounts, we hold that where a subcontractor, materialman, laborer, or mechanic, has, within four months from the furnishing of his material or labor, filed his sworn and item[393]*393ized statement thereof as provided, by the former section, and files a copy thereof with the county recorder as required by Sec. 8326 G. C. all other subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and mechanics, who file their statements within ten days thereafter, as provided by Sec. 8328 G. C. are thereby let in to participate in the fund, though more than four months have elapsed since their claims accrued. The statutes in question, having; as we read them, expressly so provided, we are not at liberty to construe them otherwise.

Under Sec. 8334 G. C. the transfer of the avails of his contract, by the head contractor to the plaintiff here, is made subject to valid claims, of the sort above described, upon the fund in the hands of the defendant, and the plaintiff is entitled to nothing until those claims are paid. So also the assignee in insolvency of the head contractor is not entitled to .fees, for himself or his counsel out of this fund, for finishing the contract. The assignee’s services were not a continuation of the assignor’s business, petitioned for and ordered by the court, pursuant to Sec. 11125 G. C.; and no special allowance therefor in prejudice of the valid claim of the other parties to this action, can be made, under Sec. 11144 G. C. out of the avails of said contracts.

A decree may be taken as in the court below.

Marvin and Winch, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HENRY, J.

Under Sec. 8324 and 8328 6. C. relating to mechanics’ liens and attested accounts, we hold that where a subcontractor, materialman, laborer, or mechanic, has, within four months from the furnishing of his material or labor, filed his sworn and item[393]*393ized statement thereof as provided, by the former section, and files a copy thereof with the county recorder as required by Sec. 8326 G. C. all other subcontractors, materialmen, laborers and mechanics, who file their statements within ten days thereafter, as provided by Sec. 8328 G. C. are thereby let in to participate in the fund, though more than four months have elapsed since their claims accrued. The statutes in question, having; as we read them, expressly so provided, we are not at liberty to construe them otherwise.

Under Sec. 8334 G. C. the transfer of the avails of his contract, by the head contractor to the plaintiff here, is made subject to valid claims, of the sort above described, upon the fund in the hands of the defendant, and the plaintiff is entitled to nothing until those claims are paid. So also the assignee in insolvency of the head contractor is not entitled to .fees, for himself or his counsel out of this fund, for finishing the contract. The assignee’s services were not a continuation of the assignor’s business, petitioned for and ordered by the court, pursuant to Sec. 11125 G. C.; and no special allowance therefor in prejudice of the valid claim of the other parties to this action, can be made, under Sec. 11144 G. C. out of the avails of said contracts.

A decree may be taken as in the court below.

Marvin and Winch, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Ohio C.C. Dec. 392, 19 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-trust-co-v-oberlin-vil-ohcirctlorain-1911.