Cleveland Ry. Co. v. McGinty
This text of 155 N.E. 386 (Cleveland Ry. Co. v. McGinty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause originated in the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county as an action on behalf of a young child against the Cleveland Railway Company to recover for personal injuries. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the railway company. Error ivas prosecuted to the Court of Appeals, and that court reversed the judgment, and remanded for new trial for errors of law, finding that substantial justice had not been done. This court has carefully examined the assignments of error set forth in the petition in error filed in the Court of Appeals, and has reached the conclusion that the errors and defects in the proceedings in the trial court did not materially affect the substantial rights of the plaintiff in that court. We therefore find error in the judgment of reversal by the Court of Appeals, and under authority of Section 11364, General *29 Code, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the court of common pleas is affirmed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 N.E. 386, 116 Ohio St. 28, 116 Ohio St. (N.S.) 28, 4 Ohio Law. Abs. 336, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 371, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-ry-co-v-mcginty-ohio-1927.