Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Koehnline
This text of 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434 (Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Koehnline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed as to infant defendant and reversed as to all other defendants.
Journal entry: This court finds that the judgment of the court of appeals ordering that the judgment against the plaintiffs below, set up in their amended petition filed in the circuit court, be suspended- and that said plaintiffs who were defendants in the original suit referred to in said petition have leave to answer therein should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, as to the infant defendant Harrison Koehnline, and that as to the other defendants in error the judgment of the court of appeals should be, and the same is hereby reversed.
It is further ordered and adjudged that this cause he remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to dismiss the amended petition of the said defendants in error filed in the circuit court as to all of said defendants in error except said infant defendant in error and for further proceedings according to law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-pittsburgh-railroad-v-koehnline-ohio-1914.