Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Koehnline

90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 5, 1914
DocketNo. 14291
StatusPublished

This text of 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434 (Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Koehnline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Koehnline, 90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434 (Ohio 1914).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed as to infant defendant and reversed as to all other defendants.

It is further ordered that the costs in this court be paid one-half by the plaintiffs in error and one-half by the defendants in error other than said infant defendant in error.—Reporter.

Journal entry: This court finds that the judgment of the court of appeals ordering that the judgment against the plaintiffs below, set up in their amended petition filed in the circuit court, be suspended- and that said plaintiffs who were defendants in the original suit referred to in said petition have leave to answer therein should be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, as to the infant defendant Harrison Koehnline, and that as to the other defendants in error the judgment of the court of appeals should be, and the same is hereby reversed.

It is further ordered and adjudged that this cause he remanded to the court of appeals with instructions to dismiss the amended petition of the said defendants in error filed in the circuit court as to all of said defendants in error except said infant defendant in error and for further proceedings according to law.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman and Wilkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 Ohio St. (N.S.) 434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-pittsburgh-railroad-v-koehnline-ohio-1914.