Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Azman

Ohio Supreme Court

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Azman

2017 Ohio 506, 72 N.E.3d 649, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1215

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 14, 2017

Docket2015-2007

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 506 (Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Azman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Azman, 2017 Ohio 506, 72 N.E.3d 649, 148 Ohio St. 3d 1215 (Ohio 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Brandon Louis Azman, Attorney Registration No. 0087246, last known business address in Arlington, Virginia.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of June 15, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

{¶ 5} For earlier ease, see Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Azman, 147 Ohio St.3d 379, 2016-Ohio-3393, 66 N.E.3d 695.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Kennedy, French, O’Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI