Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. Wooten
This text of 22 N.E.3d 1094 (Cleveland Metro. Bar Ass'n v. Wooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing by relator, Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association, of a motion for an order requiring respondent, Derek Wooten, to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with this court’s May 7, 2014 order.
Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that relator’s motion is denied. While the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law recommended in its report that the court order respondents to return the portion of the fees and repay any and all sums obtained from the 113 defendants in the underlying proceeding and provide relator proof of payment, the court’s May 7, 2014 order did not order respondents to take such action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 N.E.3d 1094, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-metro-bar-assn-v-wooten-ohio-2015.