Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis
This text of 934 N.E.2d 352 (Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cuyahoga App. No. 92917, 2010-Ohio-2208. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 10, 2010:
[1579]*1579“Whether an appeal is rendered moot when a misdemeanor defendant serves or satisfies his sentence after unsuccessfully moving for a stay of execution in the trial court, but without seeking a stay of execution in the appellate court.”
The conflict cases are Dayton v. Huber, Montgomery App. No. 20425, 2004-Ohio-7249, and Carroll Cty. Bur. of Support v. Brill, Carroll App. No. 05 CA 818, 2005-Ohio-6788.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 N.E.2d 352, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-hts-v-lewis-ohio-2010.