Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis

934 N.E.2d 352, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1578
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 29, 2010·No. 2010-1203·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 92917, 2010-Ohio-2208. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed June 10, 2010:

[1579]*1579“Whether an appeal is rendered moot when a misdemeanor defendant serves or satisfies his sentence after unsuccessfully moving for a stay of execution in the trial court, but without seeking a stay of execution in the appellate court.”
Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are Dayton v. Huber, Montgomery App. No. 20425, 2004-Ohio-7249, and Carroll Cty. Bur. of Support v. Brill, Carroll App. No. 05 CA 818, 2005-Ohio-6788.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis, 934 N.E.2d 352, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1578 (Ohio 2010).

934 N.E.2d 352 (Cleveland Hts. v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dayton v. Huber, Unpublished Decision (12-17-2004)
2004 Ohio 7249 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)