Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. Board of Regents

West Virginia Court of Claims

Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. Board of Regents

15 Ct. Cl. 215

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedDecember 17, 1984

DocketCC-84-236

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ct. Cl. 215 (Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. Board of Regents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. Board of Regents, 15 Ct. Cl. 215 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for an advisory determination pursuant to W.Va. Code §14-2-18. Claimant requests payment of $3,286.05 for medical services rendered to Greg W. Dunning, a student at Glenville [216]*216State College. Mr. Dunning became ill while playing in a varsity football game for Glenville State, and was treated at Cleveland Clinic.

In its Answer, the respondent admits the amount and validity of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds available in the pertinent fiscal year from which the claim could have been paid. The Court therefore concludes that the respondent is liable to the claimant in the amount of $3,286.05. As this is an advisory opinion, no award will be made; however, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file this opinion and to forward a copy to the respondent so that the claim may be paid.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for an advisory determination pursuant to W.Va. Code §14-2-18. Claimant requests payment of $3,286.05 for medical services rendered to Greg W. Dunning, a student at Glenville [216]*216State College. Mr. Dunning became ill while playing in a varsity football game for Glenville State, and was treated at Cleveland Clinic.

In its Answer, the respondent admits the amount and validity of the claim, and states that there were sufficient funds available in the pertinent fiscal year from which the claim could have been paid. The Court therefore concludes that the respondent is liable to the claimant in the amount of $3,286.05. As this is an advisory opinion, no award will be made; however, the Clerk of the Court is directed to file this opinion and to forward a copy to the respondent so that the claim may be paid.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ct. Cl. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-clinic-foundation-v-board-of-regents-wvctcl-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack