Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango
86 N.E. 1000, 43 Ind. App. 734, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 246
Opinion
This is a turntable ease. The questions presented by the record were passed upon in Lewis v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1908), 42 Ind. App. 337, and the facts as shown by the answers to interrogatories are analogous to those alleged in the complaint in that case.
A petition to transfer said case to the Supreme Court having been denied, this judgment is upon the authority of that case affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango, 86 N.E. 1000, 43 Ind. App. 734, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 246 (Ind. Ct. App. 1908).
86 N.E. 1000 (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lewis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
84 N.E. 23 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)