Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango

86 N.E. 1000, 43 Ind. App. 734, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 246
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 8, 1908
DocketNo. 6,608
StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.E. 1000 (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Swango, 86 N.E. 1000, 43 Ind. App. 734, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 246 (Ind. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Comstock, P. J.—

This is a turntable ease. The questions presented by the record were passed upon in Lewis v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1908), 42 Ind. App. 337, and the facts as shown by the answers to interrogatories are analogous to those alleged in the complaint in that case.

A petition to transfer said case to the Supreme Court having been denied, this judgment is upon the authority of that case affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lewis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
84 N.E. 23 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 N.E. 1000, 43 Ind. App. 734, 1908 Ind. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-v-swango-indctapp-1908.