Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Smith
This text of 135 N.E. 266 (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is á second appeal. Smith, Admx., v. Cleveland, etc., R. Co. (1917), 67 Ind. App. 397, 117 N. E. 534. The only alleged error presented, which has not been settled by the law of the case as announced in the opinion in the former [698]*698appeal, is the ruling on the motion for a new trial. We have carefully considered the instructions given and those refused, and we find no reversible error in that regard. We have examined the evidence, and we find that it tends fairly to sustain the verdict in every essential feature.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 N.E. 266, 79 Ind. App. 697, 1922 Ind. App. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-v-smith-indctapp-1922.