Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Propst Lumber Co.

114 Ill. App. 659, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 479
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedJune 28, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 114 Ill. App. 659 (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Propst Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Propst Lumber Co., 114 Ill. App. 659, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 479 (Ill. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Gest

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in trover by appellee against appellant.' The defendant filed a special plea setting up that it received the carload of lumber in controversy on one of its cars at Paris, in said county, consigned to appellee, placed the same on a side-track at that station where it could be conveniently unloaded by appellee, and gave notice thereof to appellee and also notified appellee that under the rule of appellant, appellee must unload the lumber from the car within forty-eight hours after such notice, and that appellant would charge one dollar per day or fractional part of a day after the lapse of said forty-eight hours for the use of the car. Appellant further averred that the charge was reasonable, and that appellee refused to remove the 1 urn.her within the forty-eight hours after such notice, and appellant thereupon demanded one dollar for the use of the said car for the day next after the expiration of the forty-eight hours, which appellee refused to pay; that appellant did not have at Paris sufficient and suitable warehouse room in which to place said carload of lumber, and in order to keep the same safely, it had said lumber carefully kept and preserved in the car where the same now is in good condition, and is, and always-has been, subject to delivery to plaintiff when he shall demand the same and pay the said sum of one dollar. To this plea the appellee demurred and the court sustained the demurrer.

Defendant abided by its demurrer, and the court entered judgment by default and assessed plaintiff’s damages. The plea is good.

The demurrer should have been overruled., Schumacher v. The Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company, 207 Ill. 199.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed cmd remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennsylvania, Co. v. W. A. Fraser Co.
175 Ill. App. 645 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
Purcell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 378 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 Ill. App. 659, 1904 Ill. App. LEXIS 479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-cincinnati-chicago-st-louis-railway-co-v-propst-lumber-co-illappct-1904.