Cleveland Brundage v. State
This text of Cleveland Brundage v. State (Cleveland Brundage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
|
|
NUMBER 13-02-064-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
CLEVELAND BRUNDAGE, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 36th District Court
of Aransas County, Texas.
___________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, CLEVELAND BRUNDAGE, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas, in cause number A-01-5077-CR. Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. The motion complies with Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal should be granted. Appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 30th day of May, 2002.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cleveland Brundage v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-brundage-v-state-texapp-2002.