Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Wilkerson
This text of 168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Wilkerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Since the misconduct referred to in the first, second and especially the fourth specifications is, in its cumulative effect, sufficient to warrant the recommendation of the board, we do not make any determination as to whether the conduct of the respondent in any one of those specifications might in and of itself, under the particular circumstances therein involved, be sufficient to justify the recommendation of the board.
The objections to the findings and recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.
Report confirmed and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Ohio St. (N.S.) 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-wilkerson-ohio-1959.