Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Szczepinski

Ohio Supreme Court

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Szczepinski

709 N.E.2d 847, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1474, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1771

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 7, 1999

Docket99-604

StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 847 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Szczepinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Szczepinski, 709 N.E.2d 847, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1474, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1771 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

On March 31,1999, movant filed a motion for an order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt of an order of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted, to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court, on or before twenty days from the date of this order, why respondent should not be punished for contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On March 31,1999, movant filed a motion for an order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt of an order of the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and is hereby, granted, to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court, on or before twenty days from the date of this order, why respondent should not be punished for contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 N.E.2d 847, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1474, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1771, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-szczepinski-ohio-1999.