Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Stanley
552 N.E.2d 201, 50 Ohio St. 3d 18, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 126
Opinions
Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we agree that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board. However, we find the board’s recommendation inappropriate. Accordingly, we order that •respondent be placed on a six-month suspension, but that this sanction be suspended on the condition that he satisfactorily serve a two-year monitored probation period. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Stanley, 552 N.E.2d 201, 50 Ohio St. 3d 18, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 126 (Ohio 1990).
552 N.E.2d 201 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley
1996 Ohio 271 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)