Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran
This text of 852 N.E.2d 192 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Shafran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On May 2, 2000, this court suspended respondent, Michael Shafran, Attorney Registration No. 0028991, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio. On June 26, 2006, relator, Cleveland Bar Association, filed a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failing to obey this court’s order of May 2, 2000. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion is granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the clerk of this court on or before 20 days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
852 N.E.2d 192, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-shafran-ohio-2006.