Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. Robinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. Robinson

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 536

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 4, 1964

DocketD. D. No. 47

StatusPublished

This text of 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 536 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Bar Ass'n. v. Robinson, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 536 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There is a complete lack of any evidence' of misconduct on the part of respondent other than the two dealings with Eoberts. This is his first act of misconduct. We feel that the seriousness of the position in which respondent now [538]*538finds himself has been brought home to him to the degree that a public reprimand will be an adequate discipline and will secure the public and the Bar from the danger of repetition of such misconduct or of any other breach of professional conduct on the part of respondent.

It is ordered that respondent be publicly reprimanded.

Public reprimand ordered.

Zimmerman, O’Neill, Grieeith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Taft, C. J., concurs except to the extent that the judgment fails to follow the recommendation of suspension for an indefinite period. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is a complete lack of any evidence' of misconduct on the part of respondent other than the two dealings with Eoberts. This is his first act of misconduct. We feel that the seriousness of the position in which respondent now [538]*538finds himself has been brought home to him to the degree that a public reprimand will be an adequate discipline and will secure the public and the Bar from the danger of repetition of such misconduct or of any other breach of professional conduct on the part of respondent.

It is ordered that respondent be publicly reprimanded.

Public reprimand ordered.

Zimmerman, O’Neill, Grieeith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Taft, C. J., concurs except to the extent that the judgment fails to follow the recommendation of suspension for an indefinite period. Matthias, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-robinson-ohio-1964.