Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mitchell

Ohio Supreme Court

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mitchell

930 N.E.2d 814, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1521

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 28, 2010

Docket2007-1581

StatusPublished

This text of 930 N.E.2d 814 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mitchell, 930 N.E.2d 814, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1521 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause came on for further consideration upon the March 22, 2010 and May 21, 2010 applications for reinstatement filed by respondent, LuAnn Mitchell. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that respondent’s applications for reinstatement are denied due to respondent’s failure to pay board and publication costs in this matter. Additionally, the court has been notified of a disciplinary complaint against respondent currently pending before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. See Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

It is further ordered that relator’s motion to strike respondent’s applications is denied as moot. It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause came on for further consideration upon the March 22, 2010 and May 21, 2010 applications for reinstatement filed by respondent, LuAnn Mitchell. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that respondent’s applications for reinstatement are denied due to respondent’s failure to pay board and publication costs in this matter. Additionally, the court has been notified of a disciplinary complaint against respondent currently pending before the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. See Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A).

It is further ordered that relator’s motion to strike respondent’s applications is denied as moot. It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

930 N.E.2d 814, 126 Ohio St. 3d 1521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-mitchell-ohio-2010.