Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mineff

652 N.E.2d 968, 73 Ohio St. 3d 281, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 1807
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 1995·No. No. 95-799·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and agree with its recommndation. Therefore, we publicly reprimand George Mineff, Jr. for having violated DR 5-103(B). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent and would suspend respondent from the practice of law for six months, stayed, pursuant to the Chief Justice’s dissent in Toledo Bar Assn. v. McGill (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 669, 671-672, 597 N.E.2d 1104, 1106.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mineff, 652 N.E.2d 968, 73 Ohio St. 3d 281, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 1807 (Ohio 1995).

652 N.E.2d 968 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Mineff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Geauga County Bar Association v. Bond
2016 Ohio 1587 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2016)
Columbus Bd. of Edn. v. Tracy
1995 Ohio 181 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)