Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon

882 N.E.2d 919, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1208
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 2008
DocketNo. 2006-2260
StatusPublished

This text of 882 N.E.2d 919 (Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon, 882 N.E.2d 919, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1208 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Carl George McMahon, Attorney Registration No. 0001304, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 25, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of six months, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

[1209]*1209{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cleveland Bar Assn. v. McMahon, 114 Ohio St.3d 331, 2007-Ohio-3673, 872 N.E.2d 261.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. McMahon
114 Ohio St. 3d 331 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
882 N.E.2d 919, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleveland-bar-assn-v-mcmahon-ohio-2008.