Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 330
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 Ohio St. 506
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1925·No. No. 18650·Published

Opinion

JONES, J.

1 1.. If proof óf a material-fact-necessary |o -establish :negligence rests" upon- an 'infererice 'only, the inference "must' be' á' frátíoriál orik -such' as could- be? reasonably1 arrived at from ’the-facts and' CirCuffiétances-?Testified íó.V/-,n

. ,'.2-. Tbe .mbre fact that a juror, while on, }jjr ■way 'to the jury bori,;. asked, to .¿fee the ..injured JW1 J of/j* ’¡. ^brch/ljad.'(haertbfai-e been éXhibited tb 'the jury, and .the character of the ;miumes /thereto' My/testified .not! of itself' eatfsté^for á.inistó&l;.

Judgment affirmed.

Day, Allen and Kinkade, JJ., concur. Mathias, J., concurs in the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite, 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 330 (Ohio 1925).

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 330 (Cleveland-Akron Bag Co. v. Jaite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.