Cleve Evans v. State
98 So. 65, 133 Miss. 662, 1923 Miss. LEXIS 168
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The ruling’s of the court below complained of present no reversible error, if error at all,'and the majority of the court is of the opinion that the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, from which last conclusion Judges Holden and Sykes dissent,-they being of the opinion that the evidence is not sufficient therefor.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cleve Evans v. State, 98 So. 65, 133 Miss. 662, 1923 Miss. LEXIS 168 (Mich. 1923).
98 So. 65 (Cleve Evans v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.