Clerkley v. S. Thomas Sehy D.P.M., LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Clerkley v. S. Thomas Sehy D.P.M., LLC

554 S.W.3d 555

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106434

StatusPublished

This text of 554 S.W.3d 555 (Clerkley v. S. Thomas Sehy D.P.M., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clerkley v. S. Thomas Sehy D.P.M., LLC, 554 S.W.3d 555 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine Clerkley appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision denying her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jasmine Clerkley appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision denying her unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence in the record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the decision pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

554 S.W.3d 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clerkley-v-s-thomas-sehy-dpm-llc-moctapp-2018.