Cleotis Jamerson v. Rental Mgt. Inc.
This text of 170 F. App'x 441 (Cleotis Jamerson v. Rental Mgt. Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cleothis 1 Jamerson appeals the district court’s 2 adverse grant of summary judgment in his Title VII employment-discrimination suit. The sole issue on appeal is whether Jamerson was an employee of defendant Rental Management, Inc. or an independent contractor, for purposes of Title VII protection. See Schwieger v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of Neb., 207 F.3d 480, 483 (8th Cir.2000) (Title VII protects only employees). Upon de novo review, see Jenkins v. S. Farm Bureau Cas., 307 F.3d 741, 743 (8th Cir.2002), we agree with the district court that the undisputed facts show that Jamerson was an independent contractor. See Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Darden, 503 U.S. 318, 324, 112 S.Ct. 1344, 117 L.Ed.2d 581 (1992) (enumerating factors courts consider in determining employment status); Lerohl v. Friends of Minn. Sinfonia, 322 F.3d 486, 488 (8th Cir.2003) (employment status is question of law); Schwieger v. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. of Neb., 207 F.3d 480, 483 (8th Cir. 2000) (discussing Darden factors). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 F. App'x 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleotis-jamerson-v-rental-mgt-inc-ca8-2006.