Cleora Guile v. United States
Opinion
Cleora Guile appeals following the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her medical malpractice action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Having carefully considered the record before us, see Laughlin v. Schriro, 430 F.3d 927, 928 (8th Cir.2005) (de novo review of grant of summary judgment), we agree with the district court, for the reasons that the court explained in its order, that Guile failed to establish a prima' facie ease of medical malpractice under Missouri law, see Tompkins v. Kusama, 822 S.W.2d 463, 464 (Mo.Ct.App.1991) (elements). 2
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
507 F. App'x 612 (Cleora Guile v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.