Cleon Dillard v. M. Cox, Sheriff Medical Department Amherst County Jail R. Pitsen Barget, Nurse Alfred Roses, Lieutenant

60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24790, 1995 WL 417909
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1995
Docket94-7323
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 821 (Cleon Dillard v. M. Cox, Sheriff Medical Department Amherst County Jail R. Pitsen Barget, Nurse Alfred Roses, Lieutenant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cleon Dillard v. M. Cox, Sheriff Medical Department Amherst County Jail R. Pitsen Barget, Nurse Alfred Roses, Lieutenant, 60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24790, 1995 WL 417909 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cleon DILLARD, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
M. COX, Sheriff; Medical Department; Amherst County Jail;
R. Pitsen Barget, Nurse; Alfred Roses,
Lieutenant, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7323.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 28, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.

Cleon Dillard, appellant pro se. William Sampson Kerr, Appomattox, Virginia, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's* order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge's opinion, and find no reversible error. Appellant's claim that Appellees' actions resulted in his exposure to, and contraction of, tuberculosis while Appellant was incarcerated amounts, at most, to a claim of negligence, and is therefore not cognizable under Sec. 1983. Sosebee v. Murphy, 797 F.2d 179 (4th Cir.1986). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge with appeal to this Court pursuant to 29 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sosebee v. Murphy
797 F.2d 179 (Fourth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24790, 1995 WL 417909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cleon-dillard-v-m-cox-sheriff-medical-department-a-ca4-1995.